(This was going to be an edit to today’s post on wonderful spam, and a sibling to the coverage of Data Protection Day, but it turned into a longer piece, so I’m posting it as a standalone entry).

Not long after posting about spam, I picked up (via the Tech News Review feed) this story from Friday’s Times, a report of a case (Microsoft v McDonald, 12 December 2006, Levinson J in the High Court, Chancery) from the tail end of 2006…where Microsoft took on the spammers and…well, IPKat has a good summary, so over to them:

Microsoft normally protected Hotmail subscribers against spam by setting up its own ‘target accounts’, which it used as decoys to catch spammers. Throught this system, Microsoft discovered a business trading as BIZADS that operated a website offering to sell database lists containing a large number of email addresses. Information on the website indicated that the email account holders on the lists had either opted to receive marketing communications or had not indicated that they did not want to receive the communications. However, a high proportion of people who received emails from purchasers of BIZADS database lists complained that they were receiving unsolicited mail.

You can’t make this stuff up. Microsoft sues (making use of the (European) Directive on Privacy and Electronic Communication, 2002/58/EC), but apparently in its capacity as – well, we dunno. The Times indicates that the case means that ISPs (Microsoft or even MS Hotmail is hardly an ISP as the public understands the term, but that’s what the Times said..) can make use of the anti-spam provisions of 2002/58. The IPKat report is more detailed, but hints in a narrower direction. There’s no report out there, that I can find.

Matthew Arnold & Baldwin’s ‘Upload IT’ newsletter sez:

The High Court awarded summary judgment as the defendant had no real prospect of defending the claim. Interestingly, the Court clarified that Microsoft had a cause of action under the Regulations as it fell within a class of people intended to be covered by the 2003 Regulations. Microsoft was awarded damages and an injunction to stop further transmission of unsolicited emails to Hotmail accounts.

The regulations being the implementation of the Directive through the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003. Could this all be true? Is this a good thing for overspammed customers or a worrying jump towards seeing spam as a purely economic problem rather than a privacy-related one? Did the European directive really intend to cover the hassle caused to Microsoft – and if it did, should we care?